WW3, is it coming?

[Waynex]

Only the registered members can see the link.

What do you guys think?

[Ghost]

I say we should do all we can to prevent it... Finish wars in the Middle East etc...Don't let them get a huge advantage, because if they can, they will try to kill all western civilization

[Shishir G]

No, For a fact, every country knows if they go in a War with each other once more the world will just die out.
I doubt they'll do that knowing everyone will die, however its a possibility we have tons of stupid countries on the planet without a doubt*cough CHINA*

[I D3stroy I]

I Don't think they'll be an WW3 :s

[Waynex]

No, For a fact, every country knows if they go in a War with each other once more the world will just die out.
I doubt they'll do that knowing everyone will die, however its a possibility we have tons of stupid countries on the planet without a doubt*cough CHINA*

That is of course not true, there are some crazy people out there xrider. Some people want to control everything, and they will do anything to do it, even if they take the world with them.

[Shishir G]

I Don't think they'll be an WW3 :s

This is Intelligent Debate, just try to give a more into what you having going in your mind, instead of just a "NO".
Don't take this as flame.

[Divine]

Well let's see =]. The U.S (Thanks to our current congress =D!) is in more debt than ever...

Only the registered members can see the link.

There's high tension between North Korea and the rest of the world..

90% of The Middle East is against us and would kill us all if they could ^.^

An as always, people are power hungery.. So I don't think its unlikely

[Shishir G]

That is of course not true, there are some crazy people out there xrider. Some people want to control everything, and they will do anything to do it, even if they take the world with them.

I highly doubt those "crazy people" are included among the worlds most powerful people, who can actually do something if they wanted to. Yet i agree with you saying some people want to control everything, they do, yet most of those people don't have enough power to do it. "they will do anything to do it, even if they take the world with them." That's just very stupid, i guess thats where the crazy people part comes from.
Anyways i agree with most of what your saying.

[Waynex]

I highly doubt those "crazy people" are included among the worlds most powerful people, who can actually do something if they wanted to. Yet i agree with you saying some people want to control everything, they do, yet most of those people don't have enough power to do it. "they will do anything to do it, even if they take the world with them." That's just very stupid, i guess thats where the crazy people part comes from.
Anyways i agree with most of what your saying.

Well, think of it this way. If Iran gains nuclear weapons, it's pretty much going to be the second Holocaust.

[Shishir G]

well explained lmao.

[Draxxus]

None of it matters. If it's going to happen it's going to happen. There is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it.

[Shishir G]

None of it matters. If it's going to happen it's going to happen. There is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it.

We can all stop polluting and save the planet?
oh who am i kidding, WE'RE SCREWED

[Fire cape]

No..
Simply because almost every country has nukes now.
There not stupid they know its a bad idea. (As in if one country nukes another they know there fucked aswell).

[Shishir G]

No..
Simply because almost every country has nukes now.
There not stupid they know its a bad idea.

Eliminating your competition is the idea, its stupid and they know they might screw the whole world, but some countries are willing to take the risk.

[Fire cape]

Eliminating your competition is the idea, its stupid and they know they might screw the whole world, but some countries are willing to take the risk.

They wont take the risk.
If one country nukes another.
the country that nuked the other one will get nuked lol.

[Shishir G]

They wont take the risk.
If one country nukes another.
the country that nuked the other one will get nuked lol.

where do you not get the "eliminating" part.
If they nuke someone, that country is dead, gone. POOF
then another country would do the damn same thing, and so on until 3 nukes fired which is pretty much enough to screw up 90% of the world.

[Slik]

No..
Simply because almost every country has nukes now.
There not stupid they know its a bad idea. (As in if one country nukes another they know there fucked aswell).

Sorry, that is ridiculous. There are, roughly 195 countries in the world. You are telling me that there are 195 countries who have possession of nukes? Provide proof of your point and I will happily say I was wrong.

Personally, I think it is overdue. One thing people don't really think about is population. We are increasing in population. Regarding population, something famously done was the drastic efforts made by China. They limited each family with just one child. Even if you had twins, you pick one and they are aknowledged by the government. If the one twin who wasn't chosen gets killed or raped, the law doesn't care. To them the child doesn't exist. That is how drastic the efforts are in China. We will eventually run out of land and raw materials to continue our existance with. With this said, what can you do?

When animals are "over-populated" they bring the numbers down by killing the animals. We are animals. The elite will follow through with this. They can't just state that is what they are doing, it will cause too much heat from the public, instead they create a war, they fuel angry and hatred and let idiotic men kill men, idiotic women kill women. That is how they would go about it. In what way can you possibly trace it back to the elite, that it was their mission to decrease out population via war.

By the elite, I mean the very few who have the power to do something like this. There are 195 countries in the world. Out of that, 190 wouldn't even know the true reasoning behind the wars.

I don't think it is a case of "if" but instead, "when" it will happen. When it happens, nukes won't be used. The negitive effects are too great for it to be used as in the war, instead advance combat technology will be made, the countries who can afford it will find themselves in a good position and come out better in the war. Those who can't afford them, like usual will suffer due to exploitation. In the end, if there is one, I would say a nuke would infact END the war. The countries would be too scared to continue with it and it will literally put a stop to it. If that is even a possible scenario.

[Lusfr_]

where do you not get the "eliminating" part.
If they nuke someone, that country is dead, gone. POOF
then another country would do the damn same thing, and so on until 3 nukes fired which is pretty much enough to screw up 90% of the world.

Not very many countries posses nukes it's like maybe 10 or so. The UN strictly controls who is allowed to have nukes or even use nuclear material.


And no I don't think if there is a WWIII it will be nuclear because the other countries know that if someone used a nuke then the others would and that would effectively end all life on earth (to a point)

[Shishir G]

No ittl be like, BAM BAM BAM bombsssss! ok, lets go make a ww4

Please read the "INTELLIGENT" part of this section

@lusfr, o really? didn't know that. Cool info. Guess i learned something today.

[Smudge]

I just hope that we don't provide Iran with the materials to produce Nuclear Warheads or other eastern countries. North Korea; well, that's a different story - they'll be enjoying Justin Bieber soon (lol - you'll understand if you saw the 4chan raid). Anyway; if there is a World War 3; it will be catastrophic; If the United States still had George Bush as president then .. wow; there will be Nukes flying at every Tom, Dick and Harry. At least Obama won't go ape mental with Nukes.

[Slik]

Nukes are not as powerful as some people are making them out to be. When america fired a nuke at japan, did it wipe out the entire country? It didn't because it wasn't powerful enough to do so. The nukes countries like England and Russia hold to this day, are much more powerful. However they are restricted to reasonable power so they can't wipe out part of the earth in a single blow. This is because the elite didn't want such power to be in any counties arsneal incase they went against their will. The current largest nuke in existance has been reduced in power so it isn't able to wipe out a small country such as britain in a single blow. Instead it would take multiple blows of the same power. It was orginally made to be powerful enough to take out medium sized countries in a single blow, something which can easily be redone.

Something for you to consider.

[Lusfr_]

The nuclear fallout would cause us to die. and the nukes in Japan were PROTOTYPES. They are much stronger now.

[Slik]

The nuclear fallout would cause us to die. and the nukes in Japan were PROTOTYPES. They are much stronger now.

They are stronger but not to the extent in which people are making them out to be. I am well aware of what apsect of the nuke causes us to die, it is said we humans would live from the intense heat from the neculear fallout, but we would die from the radiation released from it. Research for yourself the range of the fallout of today's nuclear warheads. It is in current discussion that a new nuke is to be made, a 500 MT nuke to deflect the comet that is said to either hit or bypass earth in an attempt to save us from it hitting us. If that beast didn't go as planned, that would cause a significant dent in earth. It won't be made anyways due to the shrapnel left behind from the comet which would cause more damage as it is widerspread.

[Snowz]

I think there will be a WWIII when a hostile country to any other country desides to either ' Option 1 ' Nuke or just fire a missle at that country for an action made against the hostile county.
and ' Option 2 ' Desides they want to end the hostility by attempting to takeover that country. Most likely neither will happen, proving that there most likely won't be a WWIII.

[Waynex]

I think there will be a WWIII when a hostile country to any other country desides to either ' Option 1 ' Nuke or just fire a missle at that country for an action made against the hostile county.
and ' Option 2 ' Desides they want to end the hostility by attempting to takeover that country. Most likely neither will happen, proving that there most likely won't be a WWIII.

War doesn't just start because of Nukes, if that's what you're trying to say. War can start at ANY time, without anyone bombing anyone.

[Avoid]

Ok, so.. America dies.. communists take over...

I hope the USA has that plan to move life to Mars in mind still.

[ryanryanryan]

If morals were set aside we would wipe out the Middle East in merely a few years. I hope there won't be a WW3 but instead don't be afraid to blow towns up with civilians and etc.

[Waynex]

If morals were set aside we would wipe out the Middle East in merely a few years. I hope there won't be a WW3 but instead don't be afraid to blow towns up with civilians and etc.

Well that's one of the main reasons USA doesn't just do that, they don't want to kill innocent people.

[Lusfr_]

the only reason no country uses nukes is because all the other countries with nukes would turn on them and declare war

[rjj95]

I just hope that we don't provide Iran with the materials to produce Nuclear Warheads or other eastern countries. North Korea; well, that's a different story - they'll be enjoying Justin Bieber soon (lol - you'll understand if you saw the 4chan raid). Anyway; if there is a World War 3; it will be catastrophic; If the United States still had George Bush as president then .. wow; there will be Nukes flying at every Tom, Dick and Harry. At least Obama won't go ape mental with Nukes.

lol obama would be like lets gid rid of our nukes then we would be fucked.. its like being in a 100 man war even man to himself and everyman has a leader. than 1 man gets his gun takin away so... yea you get what im saying