View Full Version : I'm Stuck!
Sethy
July 15th, 2011, 17:50
Well I'm currently going for 99 fletching. I'm debating myself whether or not I should get 99 doing maples or yews. Maples are a bit slower, but if I do them I'll get 93-94 mage, as well as 11gp profit per alch(about 1.2-1.3m :p)
What do!?
tedhead2
July 15th, 2011, 17:52
veeOnly the registered members can see the link. simpewl, u c?
Do maples, making money is always better in the long run.
Sethy
July 15th, 2011, 18:09
veeOnly the registered members can see the link. simpewl, u c?
Do maples, making money is always better in the long run.
A'ight Smudge.
>.>
Smudge
July 15th, 2011, 18:11
A'ight Smudge.
>.>
What can I say, everyone loves the Nyan!
OT: Yews <3 - Might as well get it done ASAP.
Sethy
July 15th, 2011, 18:13
What can I say, everyone loves the Nyan!
OT: Yews <3 - Might as well get it done ASAP.
I want to sooooo bad, but I also want the mage.
Only the registered members can see the link.
iRaViiN
July 15th, 2011, 18:32
I suggest doing something where there is multiple Benifits. Sure it might takeblonger, but what are you gunna do that's so important at 99? Just my opinion :)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Sethy
July 15th, 2011, 18:36
I suggest doing something where there is multiple Benifits. Sure it might takeblonger, but what are you gunna do that's so important at 99? Just my opinion :)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
This would have multiple benefits.
I was stupid when I calculated this, as I thought I'd just string the maple bows. Why do that when I can make (u)s for 99, and get 99 mage as well? So I've decided that I'll just do maples to 99, and alch my bows to 99 mage. :D
iRaViiN
July 15th, 2011, 19:32
This would have multiple benefits.
I was stupid when I calculated this, as I thought I'd just string the maple bows. Why do that when I can make (u)s for 99, and get 99 mage as well? So I've decided that I'll just do maples to 99, and alch my bows to 99 mage. :D
Nice, you couldnt have done badder than me, when I was calculating for my 94 mage, I spent 320m instead of 32m... T.T
Marcus01
July 15th, 2011, 19:39
Nice, you couldnt have done badder than me, when I was calculating for my 94 mage, I spent 320m instead of 32m... T.T
Thanks for the sig
irlinit
July 15th, 2011, 20:20
maples.. I always prefer to save money in the longrun
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.